FET dans Horizon 2020 - LabEx, clusters of excellence for research ...
←
→
Transcription du contenu de la page
Si votre navigateur ne rend pas la page correctement, lisez s'il vous plaît le contenu de la page ci-dessous
Technologies Futures et Emergentes
Future Emerging Technologies
FET
dans
Horizon 2020
IECB, Bordeaux, 5 février 2016
Technologies Futures et Emergentes
I – Contexte
L’esprit FET
§ FET dans H2020
Un programme en 3 volets
II – FET-OPEN
§ Un programme « ouvert » / les résultats 2014-2015 / Cartographie des
projets / le programme de travail 2016-2017 / modalités de soumission et
d'évaluation
ESRs, une première analyse
III – FET-PROACTIVE
§ Un programme thématique / les résultats 2014-2015 / le programme de
travail 2016-2017 /
En savoir plus
§ Le dispositif national MRSEI (ANR)
§ Liens et documents utiles
§ Le PCN FET
Le programme FET
Ø Un programme initié il y a 24 ans
Ø Géré par la DG-CONNECT
Ø Historiquement la partie « amont » du programme TIC
Ø Ouverture à toutes les technologies avec Horizon 2020
« Future and Emerging Technologies will help
Europe to grasp leadership early on in new
and emerging technology areas that promise
to renew the basis for European
competitiveness and growth and that will
make a difference for society in the decades to
come. »
è Objectif long-terme è Recherche
exploratoire
I – CONTEXTE FET DANS H2020
FET rejoint le pilier Excellence
scientifique et s’étend à tous
les champs disciplinaires
Mais programme toujours géré par la DG CNECT
(Direction Générale Réseaux et Communication,
contenu et technologies; en charge de la recherche
dans les TIC)
Le programme FET ? Ø Projets collaboratifs uniquement : au moins 3 entités légales (publiques et/ou privées) dans 3 pays-membres de l’UE ou associés à Horizon 2020 (Israël, Suisse, Balkans etc.) Ø 3 sous-programmes dont un programme ouvert, non thématique (FET Open) Ø Recherche exploratoire mais le critère « impact » est important
L’esprit du programme FET … des idées novatrices pour des technologies radicalement nouvelles Le programme technologies futures et émergentes (FET) a pour ambition de transformer l’excellence scientifique de l’Europe en un avantage compétitif. Ce programme veut promouvoir la recherche au-delà des connaissances, de ce qui est accepté et largement adopté et soutiendra les idées visionnaires et nouvelles pour ouvrir des voies prometteuses vers des technologies fortes. La recherche financée sera interdisciplinaire et se positionnera entre défis scientifiques, défis sociétaux et compétitivité industrielle rapprochant la science et l’ingénierie.
Fondateur
Emergence Novateur
Rupture
Vision long terme
Interdisciplinarité Haut risqueLa structure – Un programme en 3 volets
Open, light and agile Roadmap-based research
High-Performance
Computing (HPC)
Strategy
Future and Emerging Technologies
Individual research Common research
Un programme Open research
agendas
OUVERT projects clusters
Early Ideas Incubation Large-Scale Initiatives
FET Open FET Proactive FET Flagships
Exploring Developing Addressing
novel ideas topics & communities grand challengesLes types d’actions du programme FET Research and Innovation Action (RIA) = projet de recherche collaborative classique à Financement à 100% pour tous types de partenaires + 25% de coûts indirects à Entre 2 et 4 millions d’€ par consortium Coordination and Support Action (CSA) = projets divers de soutien à la recherche par l’analyse d’impact, l’organisation d’événements de promotions, la mise en place de réseaux à un ou plusieurs partenaires selon l’appel à Financement à 100% pour tous types de partenaires + 25% de coûts indirects à Entre 300 et 500 K€ sauf exception Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA) = ne concerne que les grandes initiatives (Flagships) – Pas de « Innovation Actions » (IA) dans le programme FET
II – FET OPEN « Exploring novel ideas »
FET Open
'Open is open'
FET Open est un appel blanc, «bottom-up» visant à explorer des idées
visionnaires et prometteuses susceptibles de répondre aux défis
technologiques à long terme de l’Europe. Sa souplesse autorise
l’exploration d’idées, d’approches et de concepts nouveaux et
interdisciplinaires. ”Bottom-up, but targeted - not blue sky research”
(TRL 1-3).
FET Open porte une attention particulière à l’interdisciplinarité et aux
collaborations non conventionnelles.
Ø FET Open soutient des projets collaboratifs de petite taille (entre 2 et
4 M€/projet).FET-Open Research and Innovation Actions
Scope:
[…] Proposals are sought for collaborative
research with all of the following characteristics
('FET gatekeepers'):
Long-term vision
• Long-term vision
• Breakthrough scientific and
technological target Interdisciplinary S&T targeted
• Novelty Future and
Emerging
• Foundational Technologies
• High-risk Novelty High-Risk
• Interdisciplinary
FoundationalModalités de soumission et d’évaluation
Soumission / évaluation en 1 étape
§ Partie A en ligne : infos administratives
§ Partie B : document de (15+1) pages max pour FET
OPEN
Ø page de couverture (1 page)
Ø Section 1: S&T Excellence
Ø Section 2: Impact
Ø Section 3: Implémentation
§ Information complémentaire
Ø Capacité opérationnelle
· E.g. entités légales, CV, sous-traitance, ...
Ø Section éthique
15Critères d’évaluation Actions de Recherche et d’Innovation (RIA) • S/T quality weight 60%, threshold 4/5 • Impact weight 20%, threshold 3,5/5 • Implementation weight 20%, threshold 3/5 Actions de coordination et de soutien (CSA) • Excellence weight 40%, threshold 3/5 • Impact weight 40%, threshold 3/5 • Implementation weight 20%, threshold 3/5
FETOPEN EVALUATION
Conditions for the Call – FET Open
• Single stage procedure
• High quality peer review by 4 expert evaluators
• Interdisciplinary final panel review
• Time table for evaluation and GA signature
• Time to Inform (TTI) - outcome of the evaluation within 5 months
• Time to Grant (TTG) - signature of the GA within 8 months
• Eligibility and admissibility conditions - parts B and C of
the General Annexes to the Work Programme
• Grant Agreement Preparation (GAP) - grant completely based
on proposal (no negotiation)
17FETOPEN EVALUATION
1 step submission and evaluation
Proposal Eligibility Expert Remote
submission check selection evaluations
Applicant Research Executive Agency Quality check
Ethics
Feedback
screening/ Panel review Cross-reading
in 5 months
assessment
18FETOPEN EVALUATION
Feedback to proposers - Evaluation Summary
Report (ESR)
• Collation of all evaluators' comments, per sub-criterion,
which may be mutually contradicting (no consensus) - full
transparency
• Final score per criteria is decided by the final panel review
• Total final score for the proposal is calculated as the weighted
sum of the final scores from the 3 evaluation criteria
• Final panel review adds also some additional comments
19FETOPEN Résultats Overview of topics covered* *first cut-off in 2014: 640 eligible RIA proposals - 77M€ budget - success rate ~3,75% 20
Répartition thématique des propositions pour les panels*
Cluster A: proposals mainly from Electronics, ICT,
Systems and Communication Engineering
Cluster B: proposals mainly from Chemistry,
Materials, Energy and Environment
Cluster C: mainly Physics, but also few proposals
from Mathematics, Sociology and Economics
Cluster D: proposals mainly from Life Sciences
*Session FET-OPEN de sept.
2014
Mais pour l’évaluation : un seul panel, un
seul budget et une seule liste classéeFETOPEN Résultats
Summary evaluation outcome: RIA
Grant
Grant requested
Eligible Above requested by
by above Retained Success
Cut-off Proposals threshold retained
threshold Proposals rate
received proposals proposals
proposals
SEPT 2014 643 254 805 M€ 24 78,1 M€ 3,7%
MAR 2015 665 326 1079 M€ 11 41 M€ 1,7%
1,1%-
SEPT 2015 799 Max 38,5 M€ 1,3%
(est.)FET OPEN : un programme très compétitif
3,7% 1,7%
Cut 4,65 Cut 4,9
11
700
24
600
230 315
500
670 Main list
400
643
Below available budget
300 Below threshold
200
389 344
100
0
Sept-2014 March-2015
78,1 M€ 41 M€FET OPEN : un programme très compétitif
3,7% 1,7%
Cut 4,65 Cut 4,9
11
700
24
600
230 315
500
61% des propositions de 09/2014 au-dessus du seuil ont resoumis
Main list en 03/2015
670
643 ou en dessous du seuil ont resoumis en 03/2015
12%
400 des propositions inéligibles Below available budget
300 Below threshold
200
389 344
100
0
Sept-2014 March-2015
78,1 M€ 41 M€Résultats CSA
Soumissions : 31
FET open 2 – CSA Propositions éligibles : 30
Sujets : Observatory, Propositions au-dessus du seuil : 20
Communication, Exchange, Budget total demandé par les
Conference, Prizes, Impact
propositions au-dessus du seuil : 10,8 M€
3M€ Propositions retenues : 4
0,3 to 0,5M€ par sujet jusqu’à
1M€ pour la Conférence FET
FET open 3 – CSA
Sujets : exchange, take-up
0,3 to 0,5M€ par sujet
1,5M€ - 31/3/2015 Soumissions : 21
1,5M€ - 29/9/2015 Propositions retenues : 3Focus sept.2014
Pays bénéficiaires
FR 2ème bénéficiaire
669 propositions
taux de sélection de 7% 2 Md€ demandés
3037 participations par 1500
participants dont 130 FR
280 propositions à
participation FR
211 M€ demandés par FR
10,5%
28 projets retenus - 80 M€
12 projets à participation FR
dont 1 CSA, 13,5 M€ - 16,9%
*Session FET-OPEN (RIA + CSA) de
sept. 2014Focus sept.2014
Principaux bénéficiaires
17 « Private for profit » sur 141 participants
*Session FET-OPEN (RIA + CSA) de
sept. 2014Focus sept.2014
Principaux bénéficiaires FR
13 bénéficiaires FR dont 3 industriels (hors consultant)
23 participations FR à 12 projets dont 6 coordinations (1 CSA)
*Session FET-OPEN (RIA + CSA) de
sept. 2014FET-OPEN mars 2015
Focus FR
q La France est le 4ème participant (derrière UK, DE, IT) et le 5ème
bénéficiaire (derrière DE, UK, ES, IT).
q Il y a 7 partenaires français retenus (dont 1 entreprise) qui
participent à 5 projets.
q L'Institut Curie est le seul coordinateur FR (projet Magneuron).
q Le taux de succès (en projets) est de 1,9% (1,6% en budget).Cartographie des résultats
Vue d’ensemble
Sept 2014 : 24 projets RIA
Mars 2015 : 11 projets RIA
Distribution en durée
25
20
Montant d’Aide
15
De 1,9 M€ à 4M€
10
3,4 M€ en moyenne
5
0
36 mois 42 mois 48 mois 60 moisVue d’ensemble
Sept 2014 : 24 projets RIA
Mars 2015 : 11 projets RIA
Distribution nb partenaires
15
10
5
Public body;
Private for
1; 0%
Profit; 32; 0
16% 4 5 6 7 8 9
Higher or
Secondary
Research Education;
Organisation; 119; 58%
53; 26%
TYPE DE PARTENAIRESOverview of topics covered*
*first cut-off in 2014: 640 eligible RIA proposals - 77M€ budget - success rate ~3,75%
33Vue d’ensemble
Nanoscience, Bio-Robotics
Quantum and HCI ; 1; Computer
Physics, 4% Science, Bio-
Astrophysics; informatics,
5; 21% Complexity,
Data mining;
5; 21%
Electronics,
Telecom,
Materials, Optics,
Chemistry; 6; Hardware,
25% Sensors,
Electronics, Telecom, Optics,
Energy, Devices; 3; Hardware, Sensors, Devices; 2;
Life Science,
Transport, 12% 18%
Medicine, Biology,
Environment;
NeuroBio; 3; 13%
1; 4%
Sept.2014 Energy,
Transport,
Life Science, Environment; 1;
Medicine, 9%
Biology,
Mars.2014 NeuroBio; 8;
73%Vue d’ensemble
Sept 2014 : 24 projets RIA et
Mars 2015 : 11 projets RIA
RÉPARTITION PAR DOMAINE
Nanoscience, Bio-Robotics and HCI ; Computer Science,
Quantum Physics, 1; 3% Bio-informatics,
Astrophysics; 5; 14% Complexity, Data
mining; 5; 14%
Materials, Chemistry; Electronics, Telecom,
6; 17% Optics, Hardware,
Sensors, Devices; 5;
14%
Energy, Transport,
Environment; 2; 6%
Life Science,
Medicine, Biology,
NeuroBio; 11; 32%COMMISSARIAT A L
Data Learning on Manifolds and
5 ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET FR DEDALE 2 702 398 €
AUX ENERGIES
Les projetsAnretenus Future Challenges
Innovative Method for Improving
4,9 CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY UK InnoSMART the Structural Integrity using SMA 1 995 113 €
Revolutionary Technology
ASSOCIACAO DO
INSTITUTO SUPERIOR volumetric medical x-ray imaging at
4,9 PT VOXEL 3 996 875 €
TECNICO PARA A extremely low dose
INVESTIGACAO E
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA Ultrashort Pulse Generation from
4,9 FR ULTRAQCL 2 798 445 €
RECHERCHE Terahertz Quantum Cascade Lasers
JULIUS-MAXIMILIANS Diamond materials for the
4,85 UNIVERSITAET DE DIACAT photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to 3 872 980 €
WUERZBURG fine chemicals and fuels using visible
CHROMAVISI Super-resolution visualisation and
4,85 STICHTING VU-VUMC NL 3 567 026 €
ON manipulation of metaphase
TECHNION ISRAEL MRG- Massive Reverse Genomics to
4,85 IL 3 999 661 €
INSTITUTE OF GRammar Decipher Gene Regulatory Grammar
An Advanced Methodology for the
Inspection and Quantification of
4,8 CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY UK CompInnova 2 495 863 €
Damage on Aerospace Composites
and Metals using an Innovative
INNOVATIVE AUTONOMOUS
ELECTRICAL BIOSENSOR
INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE SYNERGISTICALLY ASSEMBLED
4,8 PT Symbiotic 3 346 660 €
ENGENHARIA DO PORTO INSIDE A PASSIVE DIRECT
METHANOL FUEL CELL FOR
SCREENING CANCER
WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF NanoSmells: Artificial remote-
4,8 IL NanoSmell 3 979 069 €
SCIENCE controlled odorants
FOUNDATION FOR Laser-induced Nanostructures as
4,75 RESEARCH AND EL LiNaBioFluid Biomimetic Model of Fluid Transport 2 750 812 €
TECHNOLOGY HELLAS in the Integument of Animals
CHALMERS TEKNISKA Reservoir Computing with Real-time
4,75 SE RECORD-IT 4 193 148 €
HOEGSKOLA AB Data for future ITCHALMERS TEKNISKA Reservoir Computing with Real-time
4,75 SE RECORD-IT 4 193 148 €
HOEGSKOLA AB Data for future IT
UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III Bridging the gap: from Individual
4,75 ES IBSEN 2 663 238 €
DE MADRID Behaviour to the Socio-tEchnical
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA Magnetic Skyrmions for Future
4,75 FR MAGicSky 3 396 441 €
RECHERCHE Nanospintronic Devices
Noisy Electromagnetic Fields - A
THE UNIVERSITY OF
4,7 UK NEMF21 Technological Platform for Chip-to- 3 419 638 €
NOTTINGHAM
Chip Communication in the 21st
THE UNIVERSITY OF Magnetically actuated bio-inspired
4,7 UK ABIOMATER 2 978 883 €
EXETER metamaterials
THE CHANCELLOR, Quantum Controlled Ultrafast
4,7 MASTERS AND UK QCUMbER Multimode Entanglement and 3 219 722 €
SCHOLARS OF THE Measurement
TECHNISCHE Exploring the Unknown through
4,7 NL Phoenix 3 632 487 €
UNIVERSITEIT Reincarnation and Co-evolution
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA Zinc Oxide For TeraHertz Cascade
4,7 FR Zoterac 3 795 878 €
RECHERCHE Devices
TECHNISCHE Towards a nuclear clock with
4,65 AT nuClock 3 970 328 €
UNIVERSITAET WIEN Thorium-229
NATIONAL TECHNICAL Hybrid Electric Energy Integrated
4,65 EL HELENIC-REF 2 578 386 €
UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS - Cluster concerning Renewable Fuels
UNIVERSIDAD DEL PAIS
Redesigning 2D Materials for the
4,65 VASCO/ EUSKAL HERRIKO ES 2D-INK 2 962 661 €
Formulation of Semiconducting Inks
UNIBERTSITATEA
FONDATION PIERRE- Fabricating colloidal materials with
4,65 FR Microflusa 3 027 638 €
GILLES DE GENNES POUR microfluidics
TECHNISCHE Contrast by Nuclear Quadrupole
4,65 AT CONQUER 2 488 975 €
UNIVERSITAET GRAZ Enhanced RelaxationFONDAZIONE ISTITUTO PROtein SEQuencing using Optical
5 IT PROSEQO 2 906 802,00 €
ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA single molecule real-time detection
AALTO- Breaking the Nonuniqueness Barrier
5 FI BREAKBEN 3 998 793,00 €
KORKEAKOULUSAATIO in Electromagnetic Neuroimaging
AIT Austrian Institute of Molecular Analytical Robotics
4,95 AT MARA 3 996 478,00 €
Technology GmbH Assays
FONDAZIONE BRUNO All Solid-State Super-Twinning
4,95 IT SUPERTWIN 3 925 922,00 €
KESSLER Photon Microscope
UNIVERSITY OF
4,9 UK LIAR Living Architecture 3 216 555,00 €
NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE
A cell viewer: super-resolution
FUNDACIO CENTRE DE
4,9 ES CellViewer systems microscopy to assess 3 988 753,00 €
REGULACIO GENOMICA
pluripotency and differentiation of
MAX PLANCK
FutureAgricultu Transforming the future of agriculture
4,9 GESELLSCHAFT ZUR DE 4 871 411,00 €
re through synthetic photorespiration
FOERDERUNG DER
UNIVERSIDADE DO New technological advances for the
4,9 PT GOTSolar 2 993 404,00 €
PORTO third generation of Solar cells
Studying, Measuring and Altering
4,9 STARLAB BARCELONA SL ES LUMINOUS Consciousness through information 3 925 589,00 €
theory in the electrical brain
Mass spectrometric technology for
KOBENHAVNS
4,9 DK MSmed next generation proteomics in 3 672 625,00 €
UNIVERSITET
systems medicine
Hijacking cell signalling pathways
with magnetic nanoactuators for
4,9 INSTITUT CURIE FR MAGNEURON remote-controlled stem 3 473 026,00 €
cell therapies of neurodegenerative
disordersLe programme de travail FET 2016-2017 – En un mot q La même structure en 3 volets q Un nouvel instrument FET Innovation Launchpad q Des critères d’évaluation plus différenciés entre FETOPEN et FET PROACT. Mêmes poids et seuils. q Un budget en augmentation >+35% (624,5M€) Ciblée sur FET OPEN (RIA) 154 252 M€ q Attention : des dates d’échéance différentes !
FET WP 2016-2017 - Structure et budget
q FET Open
§ FETOPEN 1 – 2016/2017 : FET-Open Research projects (RIA)
− 84 M€ en 2016 – 11/05/2016
− 168 M€ en 2017 – 17/01/2017 et 28/09/2017
§ FETOPEN 2 – 2016 : FET-Open Coordination and Support Actions
− 3 M€ - 11/05/2016
− FET Communication (16), FET Exchange (16), FET Conference (16), FET
Innovation Greenhouse (16)
§ FETOPEN 3 – 2017 : FET-Open Coordination and Support Actions
− 1,5 M€ - 17/01/2017
− FET Futures (17), FET Exchange (17)
§ FETOPEN 4 – 2016/2017: FET Innovation Launchpad
− CSA < 100 k€
− 1,2 M€ - 28/10/2016
− 1,8 M€ - 27/10/2017Critères d’évaluation FETOPEN 2016-2017
Actions de Recherche et d’Innovation (RIA)
• S/T quality weight 60%, threshold 4/5
− Novelty of long-term vision, and clarity, ambition and concreteness of the targeted
breakthrough towards achieving that vision.
− Foundational character of the targeted breakthrough and novelty, nonincrementality
and plausibility of the proposed research for achieving it.
− Appropriateness of the research methodology and its suitability to address high
scientific and technological risks.
− Range and added value from interdisciplinarity, including measures for exchange,
cross-fertilisation and synergy.
• Impact weight 20%, threshold 3,5/5
− Importance of the new technological outcome with regards to its transformational
impact on technology and/or society.
− Impact on future European scientific and industrial leadership, notably from
involvement of new and high potential actors.
− Quality of methods and measures for achieving impact beyond the research world
and for establishing European though leadership, as perceived by industry and society.Critères d’évaluation 2016-2017
Actions de Recherche et d’Innovation (RIA)
• Implementation weight 20%, threshold 3/5
− Soundness of the workplan and clarity of intermediate targets.
− Relevance of expertise in the consortium.
− Appropriate allocation and justification of resources (personmonths, equipment,
budget).FETOPEN-04-2016-2017
FET-Open Innovation Launchpad
• New topic in WP2016-17
This topic aims at funding further innovation related work
(i.e. activities which were not scheduled to be funded by the
original project) to verify and substantiate the innovation
potential of ideas arising from FET funded projects and to
support the next steps in turning them into a genuine social
or economic innovation.
• Coordination and Support Action, 18 months, up to 100k€
• Single step submission, '1+7' pages, 2 deadlines
43FET and innovation?
Dream
An innovation engine
New technologies
New and their
knowledge applications
Reality
44FETOPEN-04-2016-2017
FET-Open Innovation Launchpad
• Scope
• Short and focused actions (18 months indicative, 100K€ funding)
• Early innovation steps to improve market- and investor-readiness
• Based on results from an ongoing or recently finished FET project
• Any FET-funded project from FP7 or H2020, ongoing or maximum 1 year from end-date of
originating project to call deadline
• The link with the originating project is to be substantiated in the proposal
• No additional S&T research
• Actions not foreseen in originating project
• No direct link needed with originating consortium
• Single participant possibility
• Assurance on necessary intellectual property rights and agreements
to be stated in the proposal
45FETOPEN-04-2016-2017
FET-Open Innovation Launchpad
• Expected Impacts
• Increased innovation potential from FET projects
(is there evidence that the chance of succeeding will be increased
through this action?)
• Creation of concrete innovations (start-up or otherwise)
(concreteness of the innovation idea to move closer to market than
in the originating project)
• Stimulating entrepreneurial mindset in FET research world
(is this providing a strong role model for going beyond the research
world?)
• Seeding growth and the creation of jobs
(is there a credible pathway presented towards a more inclusive
society, growth and jobs?)
46En résumé - appels FET-Open - WP 2016-17
Topic Budget Budget Deadlines Opening
2016 2017
(€ Million) (€ Million)
FETOPEN-01-2016-2017 84.0 11 May 2016 8 Dec 2015
(RIA) 84.0 17 Jan 2017
26.5 (+57.5) 27 Sep 2017
FETOPEN-02-2016 3.0 11 May 2016 8 Dec 2015
(CSA)
FETOPEN-03-2017 1.5 17 Jan 2017 20 Sep 2016
(CSA)
FETOPEN-04-2016-2017 1.2 29 Sep 2016 1 Mar 2016
(CSA - ILP) 1.8 27 Sep 2017
Total: 88.2 113.8
47FET-OPEN : est-ce le bon programme pour votre projet ? • Check out LEIT and Societal Challenges workprogrammes • FET is not ERC: collaboration, science and technology are all essential ingredients • It is not because something has not been done before that it is sufficiently novel for FET • FET is not long-term end of an established industry’s road-map (radical novelty, interdisciplinary,...) • An exciting long-term vision is essential, but also a new and plausible idea on how to get there • Writing a good FET-Open proposal is probably as hard as writing a good scientific publication
III – FET PROACTIVE
La structure – Un programme en 3 volets
Open, light and agile Roadmap-based research
High-Performance
Computing (HPC)
Strategy
Future and Emerging Technologies
Individual research Open research Common research
projects clusters agendas
Early Ideas Incubation Large-Scale Initiatives
FET Open FET Proactive FET Flagships
Exploring Developing Addressing
novel ideas topics & communities grand challengesFET – PROACTIVE
FET Proactive 2014 – Trois thématiques § Global Systems Science (GSS) – 10M€ § Knowing, doing and being: cognition beyond problem solving – 15 M€ § Quantum Simulation – 10M€ Budget total (2014-2015) hors HPC: 35 M€ 3-4 M€ / projet durée possible du projet jusqu’à 5 ans Complété par une action spéciale “Towards exascale High Performance Computing” FET-HPC Public-Private Partnership (ETP4HPC)
FET Proactive 2014
Soumissions
Submitted Proposals - RIA
Topic Code Eligible %
Total % Ineligible
Proposals ineligible
FETPROACT-
52 28,3% 51 1 1,9%
1-2014
FETPROACT-
110 59,8% 108 2 1,8%
2-2014
FETPROACT-
22 12,0% 17 5 22,7%
3-2014
TOTAL 184 100,0% 176 8 4,3%
Total EU Requested Total
Participants Contribution SMEs
% FR 4ème participant (après
1053 495 828 858 € 19 1,8% DE, UK, IT) avec 85
participations (12,9%) dont
11 coordinations
53FET Proactive 2014
Reason(s) for Ineligibility
The Part B (1-3 sections) is 19 pages long, and exceeds 16 pages limit set for the call.
The opinion of the evaluators and of the panel is that the proposal consists essentially in
the development of industrial management tool informed by AI methods and does not
address any of the three aspects of the call on "Knowing, Doing, Being: Cognition beyond
problem solving". The proposal might be worthwhile under some other program.
The part including the cover page and the sections 1, 2 and 3 is longer than 16 pages.
The opinion of the majority of experts in the panel is that the proposal content does not
sufficiently address the scope defined by the call on "Quantum Simulations". The panel via
majority vote decided that the proposal is out of scopeFET Proactive 2014 - Résultats
Number of Proposals Number
Retained of EU Requested
Topic Code Success
Evaluated % for % particip Contribution
Rate
Funding ations
FETPROACT-
1-2014
51 29,0% 3 30,0% 5,9% 29 9 505 569 €
FETPROACT-
2-2014
108 61,4% 4 40,0% 3,7% 25 13 042 650 €
FETPROACT-
3-2014
17 9,7% 3 30,0% 17,6% 28 9 157 875 €
TOTAL 176 100,0% 10 100,0% 5,7% 82 31 706 094 €
FR 2ème bénéficiaire (après DE) avec 11
participations dont 1 coordination, pour
un montant total de 4,75 Meuros
55FET Proactive 2014
Liste des projets retenus (RIA)
DOLFINS Distributed Global Financial Systems for Society UNIVERSITAET ZUERICH CH
Bringing CItizens, Models and Data together in Participatory, DEUTSCHES FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM FUER
CIMPLEX DE
Interactive SociaL EXploratories KUENSTLICHE INTELLIGENZ GMBH
Global systems Rapid Assessment tools through Constraint FUnctional
GRACeFUL UNIVERSITAT POLITECNICA DE CATALUNYA ES
Languages
UNIVERSITAETSKLINIKUM HAMBURG-
socSMCs Socialising Sensori-Motor Contingencies DE
EPPENDORF
Flora Robotica: Societies of Symbiotic Robot-Plant Bio-Hybrids
flora robotica UNIVERSITAET PADERBORN DE
as Social Architectural Artifacts
Mind and Time: Investigation of the Temporal Traits of Human- FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
TIMESTORM EL
Machine Convergence HELLAS
DREAM Deferred Restructuring of Experience in Autonomous Machines UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE - PARIS 6 FR
RYSQ Rydberg Quantum Simulators UNIVERSITAET ULM DE
LABORATORIO EUROPEO DI SPETTROSCOPIE
QUIC Quantum simulations of insulators and conductors IT
NON LINEARI
AQuS Analog quantum simulators for many-body dynamics RUPRECHT-KARLS-UNIVERSITAET HEIDELBERG DELes thématiques Proactive –
Le programme de travail
Ø FET Advisory Group (FETAG)
Provided for in the legislative text to give consistent and consolidated
advice on relevant objectives and S&T&I priorities during the WP
preparations
26 members selected from an open call for candidates
Balanced composition in terms of countries, gender, stakeholders,
disciplines, age.
A consulter régulièrement :
http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetail&gro
upID=2963
Ø Comité de programme (RCP – Guillaume FUSAI, MENESR)
Ø L’exemple de FET Proactive:
Large consultation en mai 2014. 491 contributions reçues
Une analyse des retours est accessible ici:
http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/consultation-
new-fet-proactive-topics-first-analysisFET PROACTIVE WP 2016-2017 - Thèmes et budget
§ FET PROACT 1 – 2016 : FET-Proactive: emerging themes and
communities
− Area 1 - Future technologies for societal change:
· Being human in a technological world,
· New science for a globalised world
− Area 2 - Biotech for better life:
· Intra- and inter-cell bio-nano-chem technologies,
· Bio-electronic medicines and therapies,
· Cognitive neuro-technologies,
− Area 3 - Disruptive information technologies:
· New computing paradigms and their technologies,
· Quantum engineering,
· Hybrid opto-electro-mechanical devices at the nano-scale,
− Area 4 - New technologies for energy and materials:
· Ecosystem engineering,
· Complex bottom-up construction,
− RIA entre 4-10 M€
− 12/04/2016
− Budget total de 80 M€ avec max. 20 M€ (1 et 4), 30 M€ (2 et 3)FET WP 2016-2017 – Thèmes et budget
q FET Proactive (suite)
§ FET PROACT 2 – 2017: FET ERANET Cofund
− 5 M€ - 24/01/2017
§ FET PROACT 3 – 2016: FET ERANET Cofund in Quantum Technologies
− 10 M€ - 12/04/2016Critères d’évaluation FETPROACT 2016-2017
Actions de Recherche et d’Innovation (RIA)
• S/T quality weight 60%, threshold 4/5
− Clarity of targeted breakthrough and its specific science and technology contribution
towards a long-term vision.
− Novelty ; level of ambition and foundational character.
− Range and added value fro interdisciplinarity
− Appropriatness of the research methods
• Impact weight 20%, threshold 3,5/5
− Importance of the new technological outcome with regards to its transformational
impact on technology and or society
− Quality of measures for achieving impact on science, technology and/or society
− Impact from empowerment of new and high potential actors towards future
technological leadership
• Implementation weight 20%, threshold 3/5
− Clarity of the workplan and clarity of intermediate targets
− Relevant expertise in the consortium.
− Appropriate allocation and justification of resources (person-months, equipment,
budget).Journée d’information FET-OPEN et FET-PROACTIVE - 25 janvier 2015,
Bruxelles
http://ec.europa.eu/rea/pages/fet_open_and_fet_proactive_
info_day_en.htmLe programme de travail FET 2016-2017 – En résumé
FET-Open 259,5M
FET-Open RIA (RIA) 2016-2017 252M
Budget FET-Open CSA (CSA) 2016
FET-Open CSA (CSA) 2017
3M
1,5M
624,5M FET Innovation Launchpad (CSA) 2016-2017 < 100K 3M
FET-Proactive – boosting emerging technologies 95M
Emerging themes and communities (RIA) 2016 80M
FET ERANET Cofund CHIST-ERA 2017 5M
FET ERANET Cofund on quantum technologies (ERANET) 2016 10M
FET Proactive – High Performance Computing 85M
Co-design of HPC systems and applications (RIA) 2016 41M
Transition to Exascale Computing (RIA) 2017 40M
Exascale HPC ecosystem development (CSA) 2017 4M
FET-Flagships 185M
Partnering environment for FET Flagships 2016
- ERA-NET Cofund action (ERANET) 8M
- Coordination and Support Action (CSA) 62 1M
Core project funding (through 'Other Actions') (RIA) 2017 176MEN SAVOIR PLUS
§ Le dispositif national MRSEI (ANR)
§ Liens et documents utiles
§ Le PCN FETL’instrument MRSEI (ANR)
« Montage de réseaux scientifiques européens
ou internationaux »Objectifs Faciliter l’accès des chercheurs français aux programmes de financement européens (Horizon 2020) Renforcer le positionnement de la France à l’international par la coordination française de projets scientifiques Dynamiser et accompagner les chercheurs dans le montage de leurs projets européens ou internationaux
Mise en oeuvre Un montant d’aide de 30 keuros (max.) pour des dépenses liées au montage du réseau/projet (missions, workshop, prestations (
Critères d’évaluation 1. Pertinence, originalité et innovation du sujet ainsi que son adéquation avec l’appel européen visé 2. Qualité et crédibilité du réseau envisagé 3. Qualification du coordinateur scientifique 4. Qualité de la planification de montage du réseau 5. Impact prévisionnel de l’aide
Appel MRSEI session juillet 2015
Ø 84 propositions ont été évaluées par le comité
ERABNet,'1'
Mul*Bappels,'1'
Sans'appel'ou'
appel'clos,'9'
Interna*onaux,'3'
Excellence' ERC 1
Science'avec'et' MSCA 12
scien*fique,'29'
pour'la'société,'1'
FET 12
NMP 2 Infra 4
LEIT-ICT 5 Primauté'
LEIT-Biotec 1 industrielle,'10'
PPP 1
JTI-BBI 1
Défis'sociétaux,'
30'
SC1 - « Santé, démographie, bien-être » 14
SC2 - « Sécurité alimentaire, agriculture,…, bioéconomie » 4
SC5 - « Action pour le climat, environnement,… » 3
SC6 – « Sociétés inclusives, innovantes et réflexives » 9Appel MRSEI session juillet 2015
Ø 36 propositions retenues, soit un taux de sélection global
de 42,8%
3#
10# Excellence#scien2fique#
1#
4#
29# Défis#sociétaux#
15#
Primauté#industrielle#
16#
30# Interna2onaux#
Ø 9 propositions FET retenues sur 12En savoir plus sur les MRSEI
Deuxième appel lancé le 19 novembre 2015
Appel clos le 12 janvier 2015, 13 heures
Page de l’appel : http://www.agence-nationale-
recherche.fr/MRSEI-2015
Contact : Maurice Héral, Responsable du programme
Angèla Samaan, Coordinatrice scientifique
Adresse mail : mrsei@agencerecherche.frLIENS ET DOCUMENTS UTILES
Mieux comprendre ce qui est attendu en terme d’interdisciplinarité
LIVING INTERDISCIPLINARITY – FET UNIT
HTTP://EC.EUROPA.EU/DIGITAL-AGENDA/EN/NEWS/FET-LIVING-INTERDISCIPLINARITY
71Quelques liens utiles H2020 website http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/ Participant portal http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/ h2020/index.html Les fiches des projets financés 2014 http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/result_en?q=%28contenttype=%27project %27%20OR%20/result/relations/categories/resultCategory/code=%27brief %27,%27report%27%29%20AND%20programme/pga=%27H2020- EU.1.2.*%27&num=10&srt=Relevance:decreasing Contact FET Twitter CNECT-FET@ec.europa.eu @FET_EU
FET-OPEN Infoday à Bruxelles – 6 juillet 2015 https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/information-day-fet-open-call Témoignage d’évaluateurs FET http://www.horizon2020.gouv.fr/cid75605/compte-rendu-session-nationale-fet- technologies-futures-emergentes.html WP 2016-2017 http://www.horizon2020.gouv.fr/cid92386/le-p.c.n.-fet-publie-le-projet-de- programme-de-travail-des-appels-2016-17.html Conférence ICT 2015, 20-22 octobre 2015, Lisbonne http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/events/cf/ict2015/item- display.cfm?id=17370 Journée dédiée à l’évaluation (MSCA/FET) – 3 novembre 2015 (Paris, MENESR) http://www.horizon2020.gouv.fr/cid95061/retour-sur-la-journee-d- information-evaluation-des-projets-fet-et-marie-s.-curie.html
PCN – Technologies Futures et Emergentes
Guillaume Fusai, représentant Comité de programme, MENESR
Coordination – Martine Garnier-Rizet, responsable scientifique
Pascale Massiani, DR, Chargée de mission partenariats
Européens, CNRS, Institut de Chimie
Subbarao Bassava, responsable des relations internationales
Mariama Cottrant, chargée d’affaires,
Université Paris 13
Nicolas Lecompte, chargé d’affaires Europe
Catherine Gilles-Pascaud, chargée de mission
Nacer Boubenna, chargé de mission pôle relations européennes
Catherine Marais, chargée de Mission Coopération Européenne,
Pôle Relations EuropéennesAbonnez-vous à la Lettre d'information et aux alertes !
ESRs, première analyse
ESRs : première analyse Corpus q Main list: all RIA projects § 24 (2014) + 11 (2015) q Below available budget: projects with FR as coordinator § 30 (2014) + 30 (2015) q Below threshold: projects with FR as coordinator § 44 (2014) + 31 (2015)
Excellence
Strengths weaknesses
Ø Clarity: Good description of the Ø Continuation to ongoing work
methodology, Cutting-edge Ø Insufficient information
technology, with breakthrough, Ø Many risks, not all of them with
promising, realistically achievable, mitigation actions
targeted breakthrough, long term Ø Foundational character not convincing
vision, Ambitious and feasible, Sound and because of the prior developments in
timely, immediate applications, Results are the field
tangible and verifiable Ø The computational aspects are not
Ø Involvement of SMEs clearly described
Ø Novelty/foundational: Beyond the state Ø Lack of precision in the description of
of the art, potential to create a paradigm one technical phase
shift, several novel concepts ambitious, Ø Lack of survey of the state of the art
original and innovative, very challenging, Ø Poor research methodology
Innovative approach, strong ambition, Ø Barely interdisciplinary
simple and powerful Ø Not quantified
Ø Totally new applications, Ø Expensive materials in use
Ø Very risky, huge payback
Ø Interdisciplinarity: Genuine
interdisciplinarityImpact
Strengths Weaknesses
Ø High impact on European and world Ø The technological actors are not specified,
economy and market, Potential to be Technological impact not clearly described
commercialized, New technological Ø No mention of technology transfer,
outcome, New line of technology, final Commercial aspects not well described,
industrial application, Several applications, Vague business plan,
patents, Proof of principle, Dedicated WP Ø Potential startup failure, No direct
for exploitation involvement of an SME, Usual academic
Ø Beneficial to the whole mankind, Multi channels, No RTD SME or end users
benefits to education and research, Ø Missing screening of IP activities
Economic and social impact, Close
Ø Dissemination prejudiced by confidentiality
contacts with users
issues, Communication plan not well
Ø Support of research knowledge transfer addressed, No dissemination and exploitation
team, Market research analysis, Concise task
but proper measures, realistic numbers
Ø Measures towards general public could be
Ø Good dissemination and data improved
management plan, New media (online
new, RSS feed service), Popular press,
Communication activities for the general
public, Presentation at technical fairs,
Creation of a MOOC, Wikipedia article,
videoImpact
Strengths Weaknesses
Ø Publications in high impact factor journals
Ø Involvement of a company, Startup
participation, Involvement of a high-tech
SME, Follow-up projects with industry
Ø Addition of postdocs, intention to hire,
High fraction of the WP leaders are young
researchers and female researchers,
Gender balance is good, At least one
young PdD researcher, Scientific work
performed by young researchers, Young
scientists as principal investigators, Training
for young researchers, Woman coordinatorImplementation
Strengths Weaknesses
Ø Too many participants so money may
Ø Good work plan, Clear milestones, not be sufficient, Role of the partners
Contingency plan, Well structured, not clearly described in the work
clear vision packages, Repartition of the
leadership of the WPs unequal
Ø Complementarity and expertise in the between partners, Unclear division of
consortium, ERC winning researcher, tasks, Limited number of milestones,
Experience in managing European Resource levels not derived from
projects research objectives
Ø Project management structure and
decision making procedures not
Ø SME Partner
sufficiently described
Ø Appropriate allocation of resources,
Ø Available preliminary results too
Justified resources
limited
Ø Lack of quantitative benchmarks
Ø Risk analysis too general
Ø Absence of end users, absence of
industrial partnerMerci de votre attention !
Vous pouvez aussi lire
